A Teenager’s Views on Rituals, Freedom & Family Tradition

By Aadrika Chattopadhyay –

Personally, I consider myself and my family liberal. My mother is Jain and my father is a practicing Hindu. Although such interreligious unions are often disharmonious due to differences in food, culture and language, this one is certainly not. As a toddler I was taught to recite the Gayatri Mantra and the Shri Vakratunda Mahakaya Mantra, I would see my grandma offering pujas every day, at the little wooden temple in her room, where there were murtis of Ganesh ji, Hanuman ji, Lakshmi Ji, a small Shiv ling and also the murti of a Jain Tirthankara that had been gifted to her by my Nanima (maternal grandmother). It was a beautiful little shrine which was decorated with my grandma’s sheer conviction as she prayed for my family and my wellbeing and often fasted too.

On every Diwali, we would have a Lakshmi puja, for which my late grandpa made all the arrangements. From fasting to ensuring that the puja took place at the right time, he was the main reason there were proper ritualistic pujas in my house.

After his passing, the Laksmi pujas and Saraswati pujas came to stop and my bed ridden grandma could no longer visit her wooden shrine and fast for our wellbeing. My mother having no idea about how to conduct a Hindu puja and my father due to a simple disinterest in rituals and superstitions, could not carry on the tradition forward. However, both of them, although disinterested in display of faith and religion, have a deep conviction in God. Theirs is an unshakable faith which they have tried to bestow upon me, not impose but simply explain that it was something that would ground me in times of crisis would be something like a stable wall to lean upon when everything around me would seem unsteady. The rest was my own choice.

However, before all this, they explained to me, the need to be a good person and at peace. According to my parents, one’s relation with God was a personal matter and in the larger scheme of things, was a secondary matter. No matter how deep a faith one has and no matter how much goodwill one has, ultimately, it’s Karmas (actions) and the humanity that one has in your heart that matters.

This is what sets a preaching believer who fails to realise that no matter what religion one follows or what faith one has, all is useless without basic humanity and kindness and a non -believer who does not bother much about faith, but is altruistic by nature and is aware that no faith or religion is worth destroying or oppressing others for.

In my surroundings I have often noticed, that people tend to associate things like ‘holiness’ with ideas of religion and tend to look down upon those who do not display acts of religious conviction openly or simply those who are nonbelievers. I have seen people oppress others in the name of religion, justify the most cruel and unforgivable acts in the name of religion and get away with it, all while forgetting that this ‘God’ must equally love all her children.

Religion is in my opinion, a reflection of society’s need to form different races of people. I may not have seen much of the world due to my age, but it has become common knowledge for me that goodness and charity done in name of religion are usually agendas with ulterior motives.

The other side of the coin includes those who are aware of the tortures inflicted by “stronger people” also known as the “ better religion” upon those who belong to the “weaker people” or the “incorrect religion’’ but since they themselves remain unaffected by the flames of the fire burning in front of them and choose to betray the oppressed by turning their backs and closing their eyes on the victims. Such people often think that they are doing the right deed, by not fighting the oppressors because they believe that a whole community cannot be sharing the same ideology.

However, they remain ignorant of the fact that soon these flames of communal unrest will engulf them too and that is when they will realise the impact of silence. It was their silence that was powerful enough to let the world forsake them and blame them for the tortures unjustly inflicted upon them. It is a fact now that for the rest of the world the loudest of screams are just same as silent pleas and so it is necessary that one learns how to fight for oneself and as a community rises against such injustices so that these fires can gradually be extinguished.

I personally believe that although rituals are necessary to a certain extent, it is important to allow individual freedom when it comes to ways of living. Oppressing and excluding others for trivial matters like dressing, income, language etc is downright wrong because if we want to unite as a community and develop over time it is necessary to have an open-minded approach.

I truly believe that this freedom and liberty to lead a life on one’s own terms without the oppressing of others is only granted in Hinduism. Especially for women, who have been oppressed globally in almost all cultures.

True knowledge of Hinduism protects women from being oppressed and allows us to be seen as more than just being subject to the authority of men.


This article first appeared at ESamskriti. Due to the universal message of the fourteen years’ old author, we are carrying this article here. She is a class X student at Apeejay School, Salt Lake, Kolkata, West Bengal. She had earlier published seven non- fiction articles in Prabuddha Bharata , which is the mouthpiece of the Ramakrishna Mission and is published from Mayavati, Uttarakhand. Prabuddha Bharata has been published from 1896.

6 comments

  1. Rejection of ritualistic religion is quite understandable. However, this young girl’s claim that one particular religion is the greatest protector of women is not based on Historical realities

    1. Historically speaking, it is true that women have been oppressed in all religions and cultures including among Hindus. However a non influenced and non Abrahamic version of Hinduism gives women equal and more rights than in any other religions, with perhaps Buddhism being an exception.

  2. A Fourteen Year Old has gifted a master-piece! Her offering of gift to the readers! That’s all I could see! Hats off to her parents who have nurtured the writer in her! I read the article. Again, I re-read it. The Community of the readers of Indian Catholic Matters will be surely delighted to read your insights – presented the way you understood as I do. I wish to appreciate the aspect of articulation by you thereby begins the process of an ongoing communication and response-able communication.

    At the outset, I wish to appreciate the writer in you, Aadrika! From my journey as a budding writer, I feel so proud of you that you are excelling in articulating your thoughts, reflection and insight into writing. I wish to appreciate the platform and opportunity that are provided by the Indian Catholic Matters Team for their magnanimity and benevolence based on meritocracy. Rightly so, you deserve words of appreciation!

    Another aspect it dawned on me while reading your article is that the worldview seems to be empirical, not a classicist and normative worldview. I second the empirical worldview which even would challenge the structured and established to take note of the historical aspects inherent in their formation before coloring them with aspects of wholly divine!

    If you come across this book, please read the section on religion. The details of the section and the book are: Bernard Lonergan, Method in Theology (New York: A Crossroad Book, 1979), 101-124. I am sure, it would be an easy read for you. Here Lonergan explains basing himself on an empirical worldview. The book has enormous insights for today’s times …He is very receptive …

    Lonergan Research Institute states: “Most of the pressing problems of our own time have to do with religion. Religion is at the heart of a great deal of violence and persecution. It also is the ultimate source of most of what is good in the human world. Is there any way of discriminating authentic from inauthentic religion? Is there a way of providing a ground for inter-religious dialogue in the pursuit of peace? These are issues to which Lonergan gave increasing attention in his last years. The depth of his response to the challenges of the two waves in the 1930s and 1950s enabled him to get a grip on the basic problems raised by modern thinkers. Lonergan gave “a radical turn to theology, philosophy, the human sciences, and human studies in general.” [Brian Davies, Lonergan (Collegeville: The Liturgical Press, 1992), 134-135]

    I end with a sense of humor: I knew the content of the term ‘non-Abrahamic’ while I was in India. It is after becoming forty plus being a doctoral student, I became familiarized with the term ‘non-Abrahamic’ while I interacted with students after Israel-Hamas conflict. Till today, I have not fully understood the significance of the meaning ‘non-Abrahamic’ … a journey has just begun .. 🙂 🙂 You are way ahead …Brava, Aadrika … You already mentioned in your response to the reader… 🙂 🙂 Looking forward to your write-ups!

    You may have a look at my peer-reviewed article published by McGill University. In this article, I propose … small human communities belonging to varied faiths as reconcilers, healers, and nurturers of social and religious harmony in the context of religious nationalism. You may do a review of the article if you wish to spare some of your valuable time: https://creor-ejournal.library.mcgill.ca/article/view/80/81

    Otherwise you may use it for a leisure reading!

    Father Arockia Rayappan
    PhD Student, Concordia University,
    Canada

  3. Respected Father, thankyou for taking the time to read my article and commenting. Sorry but most of what you said is beyond my understanding, but thankyou again for reading my article.

  4. “The purpose of a writer is to keep civilization from destroying itself.” –Albert Camus
    “Writing is its own reward.”- Henry Miller

    Just enjoy writing, Aadrika. Keep writing! Looking forward to many more write-ups/ articles from you!

  5. Thankyou so much, I’ll certainly read Camus and Miller after my boards are over.

Comments are closed.