The role of women in the Catholic Church has not been clearly specified even today. In the recent past, young girls have been permitted to be ‘Altar Girls.’ Women were allowed to be in choir group, do readings during Mass. Some dioceses (like Bombay Archdiocese) allowed lay women to distribute Holy Communion after giving them due training. Maybe some other dioceses do the same.
From 2020 the Pope has been including women in the Roman Curia offering them admin level positions. Last year the Pope appointed Sister Raffaella Petrini, to the number two position in the Vatican City Governorate, making her the first woman to hold the position.
Some years ago, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, the president of German bishops’ conference, called for the creation of a new, specific office for women deacons. That stirred the anger of the doctrinal scholars and conservative theologians who vehemently stated that the office of deacon was inseparably bound to that of priest and bishop and the sacrament of ordination.
In this context, I wish to mention two incidents that occurred in 2013. Rev. Eggoni Pushpalalitha of the Nandyal diocese of Andhra Pradesh became the first woman bishop of South Asia’s Anglican community. Her appointment as a bishop of the Church of South India had silenced critics who believed only men can play the leadership roles in the church.
The Church of South India, successor of the Church of England in India, has been ordaining women as priests since 1976, but Pushpalalitha was the first woman bishop. This Christian group has nearly 5 million members in India and Sri Lanka. One of the 38 member churches of the Anglican Communion, the CSI is a union of varying traditions, including Anglican, Methodist, Congregational, Presbyterian and Reformed. The CSI constitution mandates that 25 percent of all statutory bodies be made up of women. In this way CSI has been leading in revolutionary thinking from women’s education to empowerment.
At the time of episcopal ordination, Pushpalalitha felt that her election was very much in line with Indian values. “Numerous goddesses are worshipped, and women are highly valued in India,” she said. She made a vow of celibacy when she was in college. She said her parents dedicated her to God’s service before her birth.
The bishop said she believed God created men and women as equals, though she agreed that in some cases, men and women have different roles. “We’re first humans and then male or female,” she said. “Some of their roles can be different, but in God’s mission there is no difference at all.” A day before her consecration, she told a newspaper: “Be it any institution, women are always given second-class treatment. We need to change that by promoting values that teach us not to discriminate but treat all humans the same.”
In similar line, there was good and encouraging news from Karnataka in the same year. Women’s emancipation got a big boost when two widows assumed the role of priests at the century old Gokarnatheshwara temple near Mangaluru. From October 6, 2013, they started performing pujas in the sanctum sanctorum of the shrines of God Shiva and Goddess Annapoorneshwari. The temple allowed widows to participate in rituals and offer worship during Dasara celebrations, putting an end to the practice of keeping them away from religious ceremonies.
Years ago, senior Congress leader B Janardhana Poojary, the man behind the temple’s reformist agenda, said that the decision to allow widows to work as priests was in continuation of putting into practice the philosophy of reformer Shree Narayana Guru, who believed that all are children of God. Allowing these women to work as priests is a step forward from the previous initiative to allow them to perform Chandika Homa (a ritual) and pull the temple chariot. The two women were duly trained for four months.
Later 5,000 married women took a resolution that they would not live as widows after the death of their life partners. They also declared that they would take a leading role in religious and other auspicious rituals. The maxim – “Matru Devo Bhavah”– will find true resonance at the temple with this new social engineering concept.
Has the Catholic Church got to learn anything from the above mentioned two incidents (woman bishop and widow priests)? Yes, it has to learn a lot. Why? because even after many centuries, the Catholic Church has not realized the potentials of women and the true role they need to play in the church. Today many TV channels show women evangelists conducting prayers. Their number is ever-growing. They pray so fervently, sing so sweetly and preach meaningfully. Their preaching is far better than many priests and bishops.
A study reveals that most of these women evangelists formerly belonged to the Catholic Church. If they had continued to be Catholics, they would not have become powerful and charismatic evangelists. Is it not clear evidence that women can function as meaningful ministers? Moreover, women religious are found serving the needy people in every field, even in the most difficult places of the country/world. They reach the unreached areas with zeal. They work with more commitment than the male ministers. This is a proven fact.
Today in every field, be it science, art, architecture, engineering, automobile, computer software/hardware, information technology, fashion designing, teaching, business, writing, acting, politics, religion, driving (two-wheeler, three-wheeler, four-wheeler, train, plane, ship), medical and hospitality women have made entry and proved to be more efficient than men. Across all sectors and in many parts of the world, diverse women’s leadership is ascendant, and women are redefining the nature of leadership. Studies reveal that as women’s equity improves, ecological sustainability, economic development, public health, social stability and education also improve.
In this scenario, some women groups in US and other European countries have started demanding openly for women priesthood. But it is sad to note that the vast majority of the Catholic women is in a “deep-sleep-mode”. The women associations and activists must constantly and continuously create awareness among women to arise, awake and demand dignified positions for themselves in the church.
It is heartening to note that in his recent interview with the Reuters News Agency, Pope Francis shared his plans to expand the role of women in the Roman Curia, and announced his intention to appoint two women to the Dicastery that assists the Pontiff in the selection of bishops. Pope Francis mentioned that in the future he sees the possibility of lay people being appointed to lead certain Vatican departments such as the Dicastery for the Laity, Family and Life, the Dicastery for Culture and Education, or the Vatican Apostolic Library.
Considering the fast-changing trend, the prophetic Pope needs to move beyond offering admin/clerical positions to women. The time is ripe for the Pope and his Curia members to do a sincere introspection by shedding their ‘male-dominated conservative mindset’ and welcome women into “ministries” open-heartedly. Let us all look forward to that historical day.
It pains me greatly to read the above article in a Catholic publication claimed to be among ‘the world’s top 100 Catholic media sites’. Men and women are created equally but are different functionally, and Christ instituted the holy priesthood ONLY for men. There is to be no dispute about it. To say that women must also be ordained to priesthood is bordering on heresy. This is a thought originated due to the rise of modern day feminism and sadly (and clearly), this has infiltrated the Church as well. There’s a reason why Christ did not institute women to the priesthood (Had he wanted to do so, he had the perfect woman in Mary!) and the early Church understood this and took this in great seriousness. With the recent rise of ‘inclusive’ thought, people are forced to include everyone and anyone into everything. Women being priests are entirely different than them being engineers and doctors. I am a Catholic lay woman and I CANNOT and WILL NOT condone women in priesthood and I certainly hope we do not see this ‘historical’ day at all because no one—including the pope—has the authority to change the structure of the Church estabilished by Christ, and I am sure many of the faithful would agree with me.
I request Indian Catholic Matters to screen what they publish in this site and to crosscheck if it is in line with the teachings and morals of the Catholic Church.
Ann Thomas’ comment has compelled me to respond. She is, sadly, strengthening the belief that women are their own worst enemies! On what basis does she claim that it is heretical to ordain women to the priesthood? She claims that even the pope cannot change what Jesus has established. Is she more “Catholic” than the Catholic Church itself?
May I request Ms Ann Thomas to enlighten us where in the Bible it is mentioned that “Jesus instituted the holy priesthood ONLY for men?” The fact is Jesus did not preach Christianity. Therefore, there was no reason whatsoever for him to institute a separate priestly class. It already existed. It was this class headed by Caiaphas, Jewish high priest who was the mastermind in the plot to kill Jesus. The Gospels of Matthew, Luke and John substantiate this point. Caiaphas also presided over the infamous Sanhedrin trial of Jesus and had gathered 71 members comprising the current high priest, the elders of the people, and the scribes to do his bidding.
In the decades after Jesus’s death, the Apostle Paul wrote many letters that are now part of the New Testament of the Christian Bible. Paul was a Roman citizen and sent these letters to small communities of Christians living throughout the Roman Empire. The letters show us that Paul and his fellow Christians were still figuring out exactly what being a Christian meant. Issues related to the exact relationship between Judaism and Christianity, and between Christianity and the Roman government, were prominent topics of discussion. So when Apostle Paul and the Christians were themselves confused, how could Ms Ann’s argument “Jesus instituted the holy priesthood ONLY for men” hold water?
At the last supper Jesus demonstrated
servant-leadership' by washing the feet of his twelve disciples to imbibe in them Humility and then he broke the bread to teach his disciples to share whatever they had. His precepts were (1) Love one another and (2) Share whatever you have. The first /early Christians adhered to this teaching of
breaking the bread’ after their prayer sessions and shared simple meals with all present. They would also pool their belongings and share them with their brethren according their need. There were no churches (with huge structures), no priests and no Holy Eucharist.In fact the earliest archeologically identified Christian church is a house church (domus ecclesiae), the Dura-Europos church, founded between 233 and 256. In the second half of the 3rd century AD, the first purpose-built halls for Christian worship (aula ecclesiae) began to be constructed. This proves
priesthood’ which we see today was
institutionalized’ only after 3rd century AD and NOT by Jesus. All the sacraments were also introduced only thereafter (again NOT by Jesus but in the name of Jesus). In the process, the Institutionalized Church evolved, cardinals & bishops were elevated to positions of power (divine and temporal power) and relegated the ensured the Laity to `Pay, Pray and Obey’ category.If today’s enlightened women refuse to toe the line of Ms Ann Thomas, and decide to ordain some among themselves, who will stop them? The Pope knows this. That’s why he has given women delegates at the recently concluded Synod on Synodality some sops! He knows history well – especially the fall of the Bastille!
Readers may read the report captioned: “How has the Synodal Process affected Catholic Sisters?” The link is given below:
https://www.ncronline.org/news/how-has-synodal-process-affected-catholic-sisters?utm_source=Global+Sisters+Report&utm_campaign=e2cdf144ed-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2023_11_14_02_28&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_86a1a9af1b-e2cdf144ed-%5BLIST_EMAIL_ID%5D
Some salient points (of respondents regarding the October 2023 Synod on Synodality) in the above-mentioned report are:
I thought “synod” was a way of preparing us for Vatican III, as its purpose is described as resolving questions of discipline or administration, providing for the good of the universal church. It has three goals: namely communion, participation, and mission.
A more inclusive church, where diverse voices and perspectives are both heard and valued. (Sr. Lydia Lerato Rankoti of Lesotho Province, South Africa)
Despite unrealistic expectations, open defiance, and disregard of the process by some, the 41-page final report describes an experience of harmony at the Vatican assembly in October. The chapters of renewal identify convergences, issues in need of study and practical proposals regarding synodality, discipleship, and mission, along with challenges ahead. (voices and perspectives are both heard and valued.
The report states, “The Church needs to listen with special attention and sensitivity to the voices of victims and survivors of sexual, spiritual, economic, institutional, power and conscience abuse by clergy members or persons with Church appointments,” but is disappointing in its lack of practical response to the tragic harms of the ongoing clergy sexual abuse crisis and need for independent reviews.
(Nuala Patricia Kenny – a Sister of Charity of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. She is a physician, pediatrician and bioethicist).
Does Ms Ann believe that “abuse by clergy members or persons with Church appointments” is also sanctioned by Jesus?